August 30, 2014


Filed under: Uncategorized — sharafs @ 12:49 pm

A slightly outdated version appeared in today’s NATION

During the tense moments at Azadi Square yesterday, Arshad Sharif of Dunya News tweeted, “Here’s the smell of the blood still; all the perfumes of Arabia will not sweeten this little hand“. He was referencing to Lady Macbeth who had assisted her husband Macbeth kill King Duncan in a rage of self-illusion created by his overheated brain and witchcraft. I retorted with a line from Macbeth’s soliloquy, just before the act of murder. “And on thy blade and dudgeon gouts of blood, which was not so before. There’s no such thing”. Had Macbeth waited a few seconds to cool himself, Duncan would never have been murdered. This is what happens when emotions override the reason.

Mian Nawaz Sharif (the Duncan) and the self-serving advisors (Lady Macbeth) made the Parliament irrelevant during fits of grandiose illusions and fears they let dominate. More than upholding democracy, vulnerabilities and self-preservations prevented stretching of imagination. In the peaking moments and rising adrenaline he lost cognitive control to let distortions dictate his decision fatale. Had Nawaz Sharif democratically co-opted the house and not made them feel threatened, he would have been in a constructive position of reviewing the situation. Had he carried the house with him to re-engineer the entire system and then resigned under moral compulsions, he would have lived to return another day; perhaps stronger as a GODOT. Rather than allow democracy to grow, he went back to bite and ridicule the institution that had bred and financed him illegitimately for decades. This is an aspersion on his democratic credentials behind a façade he created with aplomb, gratifications and shady politics.

His apparent capitulation was timid with a hidden dagger up his sleeve. From a hound who oversaw the Model Town massacre, he became the hare running for cover behind the boots he had publicly ridiculed in concert with a media house. !4 hours later, both somersaulted. Grandiose around him was built on a castle of sand with money, manipulative politics, shady gratifications and narrow self-interests. The capitulation from Reason to Boots (Daleel and Gulalil) was swift and perhaps fatal. In one bad decision, he reduced Pakistan’s premier decision making body to irrelevance, reflecting a mind-set that had no faith in the system he allegedly manipulated. As Prime Minister, he lied. 

The house he relegated to ignominy deserved the treatment it got. Parliamentarians with elastic conscience sat timidly through the motions awaiting instructions from their powerful party leaders. Most with stakes in the NRO imposed system lacked the morality and ethical conviction to take a stand on questions of moral authority. Why must Bilawal Bhutto Zardari tweet “BB Hum sharminda hain” (Benazir Bhutto we are ashamed) when his father and co-chairperson could never rise beyond his balancing and compromising politics. Rather, he left the party in the lurch to travel abroad. On another extreme, Maulana Fazal ur Rehman and Mahmood Khan moved to play their respective sectarian and ethnic cards. PPP in the Parliament is not far behind. What they have at stake is MNA funds and massive corruptions. 

But it is too early to predict the course of events.. The opposition and PMLN allies in the parliament have reacted in their own interests. Chaudary Nisar’s defiant tone means so. The Prime Minister himself has declared on the floor that he had never asked the COAS to arbitrate. It appears that after the rush of the moment, the Prime Minister has reviewed his stance and put the COAS in an embarrassing position. If retraction is true, then cunningly, he has lured the military and two political parties in the same bracket. This is not a game the Prime Minister should play with his armed forces.

This edifice of PMLN politics was not crafted in a day. After the Supreme Court rebellion in 1997, PMLN influence had permeated the apex courts. Politicised appointments were made in the executive and lower judiciary have now grown to be the decision makers. In 2006, elements in judiciary and a media house were co-opted to create a very strong non state group that could create perception, punish dissidents and promote political interests. Monetary gratifications were part of the package. If a sincere effort at retuning the system will reveal cabals, cartels and groups that work together to malign honest bureaucrats, heads of regulatory and accountability bodies to make shady deals. With remnants of Chaudary Courts still effective, it will be difficult to solicit balanced legal judgements. The unconstitutional precedence set by Justice Ramday empowering the full bench to review every decision will continue to haunt. Stay orders, writ petitions and delaying tactics may affect timelines.

A case study of how and why Chairmen NAB, SECP, NADRA and President State Bank of Pakistan were axed would reveal the extent of complicity amongst the trio. The media house would carry out the character assassination through select journalist; the targeted officials would be coerced by the top management while judiciary would move in through suo moto to misuse its writ. The same mechanism also worked towards rigging the election as alleged by an ex official of Election Commission and also the case of 35 punctures. The biggest test of reforms will be reclaiming the extra space gained by the judiciary through constitutional legislating. In case this is not accomplished, all cases of high handedness, criminality and accountability are likely to be over turned by the special benches.

The investigation of electoral rigging should be carried out through criminal investigations by a Federal Inquiry Commission and Joint Investigation Teams. All electronic trails, minutes at ECP and Ministry of Law, printing of ballot papers, violations of Articles 62-63 and the individuals who benefited must be subjected to critical criminal inquests. NAB is on record having provided list of individuals with records of corruption, defaults and accountability cases. It must be questioned why this information was ignored to benefit individuals and Chairman NAB removed in a controversial manner.

PMLN has naively offloaded its burden on the shoulders of the army and attempted to discredit it. If PTI and PAT do what they threaten, the military having established contact will be seen to be taking sides. If the army does not sail through the rigmarole it stands to lose credibility. Nawaz Sharif will urge them through more blunders to act. Then they hope, their proxies will wage a civil war.

In the scheme of events the government and sitting parliament will not cooperate; else soft boots are at risk of becoming hard ones.

Brigadier (Retired) Samson Simon Sharaf is a political economist and a television anchorperson. Email and twitter:



Leave a Comment »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Blog at

%d bloggers like this: