By Samson Simon Sharaf
“There is a tide in the affairs of men. Which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune”
Shakespeare in Julius Caesar
Though I would agree with the intentions of others who are writing and talking on the prevailing situation in Pakistan, I may not agree with their conclusions. These are debatable Options or Models on which opinion makers base their analysis, like Sisi, Erdogan, Bangladesh or the Sri Lankan Models. Though these offer some conclusions, they are part of history not relevant to environments in Pakistan.
I have not written for a while and may appear to be out of groove and rusty. My essays are always researched within the paradigms and never dwell into conspiracy theories. My hypotheses are testable.
The over riding factor in case of Pakistan is its nuclear capability and the instability curves fervently discussed in the West as precursors to de-nuclearization.
Pakistan’s decision makers including the establishment have never got into the groove of statesmanship worthy of a nuclear power. In this series of self-perpetuated crises, all elements and stake holders in Pakistan’s decision-making cycle have to impose super caution about how and where they tread.
Strategy is not restricted to planning and fighting wars. Its most important element is the people of the country and how their motivations and emotive factors are harnessed. It is crucial to maintaining external peace and internal harmony.
When Karl Von Clausewitz wrote about the Centre of Gravity, he made a particular reference to aspirations of the people. His Trinity encompassed the people, military and government.
Those were the early days of wars based around Nationalism and in other words, ‘People’s Wars of National Unifications’. Later the evolving perspectives of political economy eclipsed nationalism with trans nationalism and globalism. In strife ridden areas, nationalism in diverse and exploitable forms still prevails. This is what foreign and domestic actors consider the soft under belly. They have identified it in case of Pakistan and will pursue the course relentlessly. It is up to Pakistanis to deter and defeat it.
Based on the nuclear strikes on Japan, Cold War Pacts and Korean War, the paradigm of armed conflict changed. Sir Michael Eliot Howard in his ‘Forgotten Dimensions of Strategy’ placed the Social Dimension i.e., power of the people, right on top of the pyramid.
Prohibition of direct armed conflict amongst nuclear powers has pushed the conflict to other peripheries that includes economy and civil unrest. This is where Instability and Compellance trajectories come into play. If not deterred, these may become most lethal. Pakistan is a step closer.
In Pakistan’s present unrest and crises, the people of Pakistan with their aspirations have become the Centre of Gravity. Because this notion transcends into hearts and minds, commanders of modern armies need to be cognizant that they command a Citizen’s Army impacted by ever expanding dimensions of media. The exclusive nature of barracks and social isolation have taken many steps backwards.
With this theoretical background in mind, lets discuss the crises at hand i.e., Regime Change Operation, its dynamics and how its effects National Security.
There is a military tactics axiom. “Any plan that works to perfection must be relentlessly investigated”. Logically, no plan can work as conceived. It must have flexibility for a course change.
If the ultimate objective was Social Contract revolving around well being of the nation, modalities to achieve the same objective can be modified. Inflexibility in execution is recipe for defeat.
But as events manifest, this is not the case. Covid 19 was well handled and thereafter there were two good years of productivity. The good advantage was surrendered to regime change. No narrative can change this perception.
But if the objective was to get rid of a particular individual, his replacement with most questionable individuals raises many questions, ifs and buts in minds of the public.
Data available from times when these individuals were catapulted to elites and their governance statistics do not reflect them as saviors of the nation. This perception has traction with the people and gravitates them as the Centre of Gravity; something that must not be ignored.
Deal maker politicians have run out of public support as indicated in series of provincial and national bye elections. They are too compromised to challenge Imran Khan on the streets. Their salvation lies in perpetuating a street chaos that ultimately bring people head on with the military.
Planners in London and inheritors of Pakistan People’s Party seem to follow this course. Consequently, they will continue to jack pressure on the military to prevent a positive solution to the crisis.
Dynamics of any ongoing conflict cannot be predicted. Sometimes the best intentions plummet into the dungeons. Even if we accept, it is not Intentional, the byproduct is now the primary product. Dismantling of the State is gaining momentum while the opposition has writ over two major provinces, Azad Jammu and Kashmir and Gilgit-Baltistan. It commands public and geographical places. Arshad Sharif’s assassination has added an impetus.
Imran’s popularity for reasons mentioned above is surging and yet, not peaked. What happens when this Long March reaches Rawalpindi from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Gilgit-Baltistan, Azad Jammu and Kashmir and Punjab.
Why the garrison city of Rawalpindi? Do the barricades and extension of Red Zone leave any option? Who is taking these decisions and why needs head scratching?
There is only one way out of these crises. Respect the aspirations of the people and go for immediate free, fair and transparent elections. Let the party that commands the hearts and minds of the people charter Pakistan’s future.
Biting pride than licking wounds is always the better part of valour.
“The race is not to the swift or the battle to the strong, But time and chance happen to them all”
Ecclesiastes 9:11